[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ATRN (was Re: [Sheflug] am I on yet?)
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Perry Ismangil wrote:
> On 18 Oct 00, at 11:21, the honourable Richard Stevenson wrote this
> about Re: [Sheflug] am I on yet? :
>
> > Now I'm just waiting for them to implement ATRN, which combines TURN with
> > strong authentication (a la AUTH) - finally, batched SMTP without it being
> > some strange hack... :-)
>
> I guess you already knew about ODMR (RFC2645), which uses ATRN
> protocol.
Yes - that's how I became aware of it. Someone asked in
comp.mail.sendmail if it had been implemented, so I immediately went and
looked it up (I've got the whole set of RFCs here <grin>). I like it...
many advantages over both TURN and ETRN :-) I can't see any immediate use
for it (not for me, anyway), but I'd just like to play with it. I'm a
sick puppy...
> We tried to patch sendmail for ATRN, but it's quite a complex beast
> inside... so in the end we wrote a special ATRN server that flushes
> the sendmail queues.
I'll go and have a look at that at some point :-) I agree, Sendmail is a
nasty piece of work inside. I once added a configuration option so that
you could put up a web page saying why email was a bad choice of medium
for sending large files, and the URL could be put into the configuration
file and would appear in the error message. I can't believe the amount of
work it took for something relatively simple.
Cheers
Richard
--
Richard Stevenson | Help Microsoft stamp out software
Systems Support Specialist | piracy: install Linux today!
richard.stevenson@team.xtra.co.nz |
Phone +64 9 355 5231 | <http://www.linux.org>
Mobile +64 25 2903101 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheffield Linux User's Group - http://www.sheflug.co.uk
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
- <sheflug-request [at] vuw.ac.nz> - with the word
"unsubscribe" in the body of the message.
GNU the choice of a complete generation.